NDP push for more bilingualism

Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

Or is it a trick to split Conservatives?

Everything\'s well...

The NDP wants the 10 most important positions in parliament filled by bilinguals.

The ten key positions, all highly-paid, include the Auditor General, the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO), the Privacy Commissioner, the Access to Information Commissioner, the Ethics Commissioner and the Commissioner for Lobbying.

Currently only Auditor-General Michael Ferguson, recently appointed by Stephen Harper, is not bilingual. Ferguson was given a year to learn to speak French. All the others are fluent in both official languages.

This New Democratic Party initiative comes after Official Languages Commissioner Graham Fraser criticized the appointment of the unilingual Ferguson in his last report.

Fraser goes further. He accused the Harper government of "violating" the Official Languages Act by appointing Ferguson, a unilingual Anglophone after being clearly warned not to do so. Harper is not the sort of guy who appreciates being criticized openly.

New Democrats have quickly learned a few Machiavellian tricks, mainly how to get the conservatives bouncing up against themselves.

The NDP legislation has the potential to divide conservatives into two camps - those who favor bilingualism for holders of high positions as officers of Parliament, and those who are satisfied to continue the pattern of unilingualism so prevalent in Ottawa in the past which usually favored, in Ottawa, almost always an English-speaking person.

Indeed, this is precisely what happened. Minister Max Bernier quickly proclaimed that he is in favor of the NDP legislation favoring bilingual officers. Bernier is proud Beauceron who speaks excellent French as well as English. He is also close to the Montreal English-speaking business community.

"Very good bill," said Bernier. "I can tell you that personally I will support it and I hope that my government will support it."

Is that clear enough?

Bernier added: "We are in a bilingual country, and officers of Parliament should be bilingual from their appointments."

James Moore, from British Columbia, who is a fully bilingual, and happens to be the first French immersion graduate from B.C. to make it to cabinet, surprised many by speaking out against the NDP legislation on bilingualism.

If there is a minister who would expect to support bilingualism for parliamentary officers, it would be the minister who answers for official languages in Parliament.

That's the perplexing predicament in which Harpers finds himself. One minister is for the NDP bilingualism, one against. So which way does Harper go? And don't ministers have to all agree - cabinet solidarity and all that?

Ah, those wicked NDP. They've learned the game of politics awfully fast and are about to stick it to Harper no matter which way he turns.

So which minister is going to pay for it with his job, or will one of the two have to eat crow? Is there a cabinet reshuffle in coming?

 

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page

Comments

Comments

Recent comments

  • Kim McConnell
    May 10, 2012 - 13:11

    Official Bilingualism discriminates against the English-speaking majority in Canada. With only 3.1% of Canadians outside Quebec who identify themselves as Francophones, why should we make the minority language the criteria for any job in the Federal, provincial or municipal government outside Quebec while allowing Quebec to pass legislation against English-speakers in Quebec? This is tribalism of the first order with Francophones using their built-in advantage against the English-speaking majority. The NDP only speaks for Quebecers who have already lost their clout in Canadian politics and will lose more when the seat allocation occurs soon. The Canadian voter had better wake up - NOW - before it gets even worse!!! Bernier is a Quebecer first and Canadian second - of course he will want conditions that will empower even more the people who speak the minority language.

  • Let'sTalkCandidly
    May 09, 2012 - 20:14

    The NDP have to find a way to keep their only constituency in Canada (Quebec) happy. They have no support whatsoever in economically powerful Alberta and Saskatchewan and only a smattering in BC so I suppose they have nothing to lose by alienating us. But they also cannot possibly extend their support outside of Quebec by promoting the domination of French-speaking positions in the federal gov't. This notion of pitting Quebec MPs against the others and forcing elected representatives out of hiding on this issue works fine for us here in the west. Since we are the people who elected the Conservatives (without our seats they would still be on the back benches) this is a battle we are happy to see fought in the open. But how the NDP think they will GAIN from this is beyond me?