• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (2)

Budget uproar

Budget uproar

Budget uproar

Raffy Boudjikanian
Published on December 3, 2008
Published on February 6, 2010
Raffy Boudjikanian  RSS Feed
Topics :
Pointe Claire city council , Montreal , West Island , Pointe Claire

While Montreal Mayor Gérald Tremblay unveiled a 2009 budget which his team touted as cautious and rigorous last Wednesday, West Island mayors came out strongly against it, claiming savings that should have been there for reconstituted municipalities based on an agreement signed in the summer were not there, and this would negatively affect their own budget calculations. "We expected to see a reduction in the agglomeration budget," said Pointe Claire Mayor Bill McMurchie.

According to McMurchie, the agreement signed between the 15 demerged municipalities on the Island of Montreal, the agglomeration and the provincial government about Bill 22, a piece of legislation that would redefine the division of powers between Montreal and the suburban cities, was supposed to guarantee a minor boost to the budgets of each demerged municipality. "We just didn't get our share of the agreement," McMurchie said.

Pointe Claire city council is set to adopt its 2009 budget on Monday.

With the agreement returning some agglomeration responsibilities like maintenance of arterial roads or sports centre expenses back to demerged cities, each municipality should have received a share of $30 million paid to Montreal by the provincial government. However, that did not happen.

Instead, Beaconsfield Mayor Bob Benedetti said, the City of Montreal's budget went up by roughly that amount. He acknowledged some of Montreal's expenses, such as more investment into public transit or infrastructure. However, he said those expenses come up to $107 million, only a fraction of Montreal's total budget.

Dorval Mayor Edgar Rouleau was also highly critical of the budget. "I'm not sure we are getting our fair share of the total budget," Rouleau said.

The $30 million should have been divided between the demerged cities according to each of their own expenses. Benedetti estimated Beaconsfield should have gotten about $1.2 million, whereas Rouleau pinned Dorval's number closer to $3 million. "We expected a reduction in the budget," Rouleau said, "but we also expected Montreal to find a way (to avoid giving us the money)."

With the reduction not met, the mayors said they would have to take a careful look at their own budgets. "It's back to the drawing board," Benedetti admitted, also insisting that his administration would not resort to raising Beaconsfield residents' taxes to make up for the lost savings. "I just can't do that," he said.

McMurchie said the additional responses downloaded on Pointe Claire mean that city also has to look at its 2009 budget again, but did not comment on whether he would have to raise taxes again. "We're tabling our budget Dec. 18," Rouleau said. Until then, he would also have to meet with his council and various city service departments to discuss what to do in light of Montreal's announcements.

Kirkland will adopt its budget Dec. 15 while Beaconsfield’s budget meeting is set for Dec. 17.

Comments

  • Username
    gerry mcleod
    - February 17, 2010 at 14:18:09

    the districts that did not recieve the money from the city of montreal, should form a coalition and contact the quebec government to try and force the city of montreal to give the money promised to the districs, or withold the taxes paid to the city of montreal in order to pay for the services needed in thier own districts

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    gerry mcleod
    - February 10, 2010 at 12:55:37

    the districts that did not recieve the money from the city of montreal, should form a coalition and contact the quebec government to try and force the city of montreal to give the money promised to the districs, or withold the taxes paid to the city of montreal in order to pay for the services needed in thier own districts

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Chronicle is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Recent Announcements

Current Obituaries in The Chronicle

Find an Announcement

Find an Announcement
loading...

Advertising