Free classified ads | Online Auctions | Our Weeklies | Long distance call | Weblocal
The Chronicle
Home
Send this text to a friend Print this article Comment on this article

Galganov Returns to Fight Again

Richard Cléroux by Richard Cléroux
View all articles from Richard Cléroux
Article online since July 18th 2008, 13:37
Read all 4 comments about this article / Comment on this article
Galganov Returns to Fight Again
Ken Hill, mayor of Russell.
Galganov Returns to Fight Again
Back in the days of the Bill 101 language wars, just the mention of Howard Galganov’s name was enough to get a dust-up going.
But Galganov lost the war and Bill 101 became law. As he had promised the great language crusader closed down his little store in Notre-Dame-de-Grace and left the province forever.

He fled to nearby Ontario. Two weeks ago Galganov resurfaced again, climbed back up on his steed, and galloped full speed into the sleepy village of Russell to battle against the forces of language evil.

But this time he’s not fighting for bilingualism.

He’s fighting against bilingualism.

That’s because Russell township council passed a bylaw last month that says from now on all new commercial store signs have to be in BOTH official languages. It’s the kind of exposure for bilingualism that would warm up a lot hearts of back in the West Island.

The township council says the bylaw will reflect the bilingual nature of the community that is about 60-40 French-English.

Russell village is more Anglo part, and Embrun Village the more Franco part. But overall, the township is about two-thirds bilingual and they get along wonderfully.

Take the mayor, s Ken Hill. Nobody would mistake him for Molière, but he married a French-speaking woman and now he speaks French well enough to run the township.

The sign bylaw however has angered some Anglophones in Russell who feel that creeping bilingualism is taking over. First the signs, and then what’s next?

Galganov denies that he’s fighting against bilingualism or that he’s for English-only signs. He’s says he’s fighting for freedom. In other words, fighting for the right of business not to have to put up a bilingual sign.

That’s what he fought for back in Montreal, he says, not for bilingualism. The hair-splitting is lost on the locals. They see him as anti-French.

Galganov doesn’t live in the community. He lives in Williamstown, about 40 kilometres away in the next riding.

But the roads are good.

It didn’t help when he printed up 5,200 pamphlets entitled Boycott French-owned Stores and had Canada Post distribute them all through Russell.

The problem is there is a Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Canada that says it’s against the law to discriminate on the basis of language, religion, gender, sexual orientation, color, nationality, and a lot of other things.



Boycott French-owned Stores is right up there on the human rights no-no list along with Boycott Jewish-owned Stores, or Boycott Arab-owned Stores.

How Canada Post could have distributed such a pamphlet has to be explained by Ottawa.

The pamphlets attracted the attention of Galganov’s old nemesis, Gilles Rhéaume, former Société Saint-Jean Baptiste president who heads the Ligue contre la francophobie canadienne. Rhéaume came charging out to Russell, ready for bear.

Here we go – a good, old-fashioned, Quebec-style language dust-up.

First of all, Rhéaume went to the local Ontario Provincial Police detachment and filed a complaint for hate literature against Galganov. The cops assigned their best man, detective Jean Coutu. Yup, that’s his real name. Then Rhéaume began rallying his troops.

Galganov countered. He hired Ottawa lawyer Kenneth Binkley and filed a suit against the township bylaw in Ontario Superior Court. The township lined up noted Ottawa Franco-rights lawyer Ronald Caza.

Galganov launched a campaign to raise money for his fight, making it clear that he won’t be using it to fund his campaign as an independent candidate in the Cornwall area in the next federal election.

Local libertarians quickly rushed to Galganov’s side, as did Canadians for Language Fairness fresh from their loss in Ottawa to prevent bilingualism at City Hall.

Some locals refused to give money to Galganov to fight the township since the township is using tax money to fight Galganov. The lawyers are getting rich on us, they said.

At first, the Russell Chamber of Commerce was on Galganov’s side. But when his pamphlet ended up at police station, they refused to pay for it. Galganov accused the Chamber of betraying him and took out an ad in a local weekly to denounce the Chamber.

The owner of a hair salong had two bilingual signs stolen from her lawn overnight. A radiator shop owner put up a French-only sign to defy council. Starting to look more like Quebec.

These Ontario innocents ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

Readers are invited to post comments to Mr. Cleroux

Your comments

Full name:
(required)


Email address:


Your comments :
(required)


Please retype the word displayed below Can't read the word?

Please retype the word displayed below:


Gerry Power

Comment online since August 8th 2008
You state in your article that Howard Galganov is against bilingualism.I disagree.He is against forced bilingualism .It is the right of every Canadian to post a sign in any language he or she chooses.This is not Quebec with its language (Gestapo)police going around fining and removing English signs.Do you not remember the United Nations human rights ruling which was overturned by the infamous Notwithstanding Clause? Also isn't it hypocritical that Quebec accepts billions of dollars a year from English-speaking provinces but proscribes the English language.As you say "These Ontario innocents ain't seen nothin' yet".You are correct but we are catching on .Look at all the street signs which were painted over to satisfy the so called nationalists.More money wasted and the biggest disaster of all the loss of 400,000 people.Finally if the "anglos"in Montreal had stood up and told these separatists to go to hell ,we would not have these issues.A little bit of courage could have gone a long way.You also say that he fled to Ontario.Wouldn't you if your life and that of your family was repeatedly threatened? ?Sow the wind and reap the whirlwind?Sincerely,Gerry Power,Ottawa

Daniel Rosensweig

Comment online since August 2nd 2008
As usual, the media doesn't get it, and seeing this article was written by a French speaking person, why doesn't this surprise me?

The bone of contention here is that Mayor Hill is FORCING bilingualism in Russell Township. In his blog, galganov.com, Howard Galganov NEVER stated there is a problem with having bilingual, English-only or French-only signs. Post what you want, but don't tell people what they MUST do. Galganov has CLEARLY stated that he would never support language legislation outside Quebec that went against the use of French. That would be just as wrong as what Bills 22, 1, 101 and 178 have done. Yes, Bill 1 never was given royal assent, but the idea of putting it on the table forced the less xenophobic Bill 101 to replace it (although it was xenophobic enough for this writer to choose 401 over 101).

Other of these small-market on-line and in-print community tabloids, especially ones in French, take the path of least resistance and simplistic view that Howard Galganov is a racist, a bigot. Sorry, Mr. Cléroux et al., but no! Howard Galganov has done some very worthwhile community projects to help the less fortunate, and there is NO discrimination when it comes to whoever seeks help from the charitable organizations he has supported, whatever the colour of their skin and language spoken. In Cornwall, a clinic turns away English-speaking people. On French school buses, English kids are kept off those buses in fear of some kind of language assimilation. Ridiculous!

So-called English institutions (they really no longer exist) in Quebec MUST serve in French if the patient demands it. Professionals in Quebec must pass proficiency exams in French to practice their chosen profession, even if they never serve French speaking clients. This is why there is no such thing as an English institution left in Quebec. The Jewish General Hospital in Montreal was built with the private money of the Jewish community to enable that community to have kosher food and chaplaincy services available to Jewish patients. The other hospitals didn't give a damn about providing such services, hence the JGH. The JGH NEVER turned down patients, neither because of the language they speak nor because they weren't Jewish. Most of the staff is not Jewish either, so thanks to the Jewish community, jobs were created for the population at large.

Then one day in comes some paramedic yo-yo and decides to have the non-kosher lunch he brought in from outside right in the kosher cafeteria. Jewish (and Muslim) dietary laws are very sensitive about this. The JGH provides lounges for the mostly non-Jewish staff to have their meals away from the kosher cafeteria.

Then along comes Jean Charest and his band of merry ignoramuses and orders the JGH to compensate that paramedic numbnuts. HEY! Who built that hospital? When I go into someone's house, I respect their way of living, IN THEIR HOUSE. If they're kosher, halal, vegetarian, whatever, I go with the flow. Once I leave their premises, I'm free as a bird to eat what I want. I don't impose MY will in THEIR house! There is something to be said for having consideration, but Quebec can't see past the end if its collective nose.

It doesn't surprise me that Mr. Caza sent Galganov a bullying document about how he plans to use the Russell Township's treasury to bury Galganov financially. That's the best he can do?

I left my French problems in Quebec, and I don't want them crawling more than they already have over to the West bank of the Ottawa River. Post your business signs and speak away in French if you will, but don't force me or the rest of Ontario to do so.

John McKay

Comment online since July 21st 2008
To this Ontarian/Ontarois, this escapade has the feeling of a proxy battle. Two language warlords from Quebec, carrying out yet another round of language cage wrestling, however this time in the client state of Ontario.

Folks, in my humble opinion,go with the flow, go with the bilingual signs, and leverage this into something more positive for your businesses. This Ontario anglo has been doing this for 20 years now, and I enjoy beating my competition by getting clients from both sides of the linguistic divide.


Shaheen Ashraf

Comment online since July 18th 2008
Sounds like Mr.Galganov has a LOT of time on his hands. In a way he is right, we should have a choice.. if I am French Speaking, I should be happy to put up my sign in French... without being judged or penalized. Same goes for English signs. We in this world have to LEARN to accept and get along with one another ... recognizing our differences. I think humanity is evolved enough??? Are we????????

Related Newspapers