Free classified ads | Online Auctions | Our Weeklies | Long distance call | Weblocal |
The Chronicle
Merkado TEMP
Send this text to a friend Print this article Comment on this article

Supreme Court strikes down legal limits on English-language education

Verdict leave no sides truly satisfied

by
View all articles from
Article online since October 22nd 2009, 15:56
Read all 4 comments about this article / Comment on this article
Supreme Court strikes down legal limits on English-language education
Lester B. Pearson school board chairperson Marcus Tabachnick says English-language school boards in the province will now have to negotiate with the provincial government to find common legal ground. Chronicle, file photo.
Supreme Court strikes down legal limits on English-language education
Verdict leave no sides truly satisfied
The Supreme Court of Canada struck down a 2002 law by the Quebec government that limits access to English-language schools for students of the province in a ruling today, calling Bill 104 "excessive."

"The limits on the [students'] constitutional rights was not justified under […] the Canadian Charter," wrote Judge Louis Lebel in the court's verdict.

Up to seven years ago, a loophole in Quebec's Bill 101 allowed parents to send their children to English-language public schools so long as they had completed a year of studies at a private English school.

A Parti Québecois government in 2002 created Bill 104 to close the loophole, but a series of appeals and counter-appeals between the Ministry of Education, Leisure and Sports (MELS) and a group of 25 families challenging that decision has since then been fought in court, with the Supreme Court striking down in favour of the families today.
A partial victory
Still, advocates of the families are calling the ruling a "partial victory." That is how attorney Brent Tyler characterized it to media, focusing on the fact the court's judgement is still giving the government a year to change the wording in Bill 104.

For Marcus Tabachnick chairperson of the Lester B. Pearson school board, which oversees all West Island English public schools, that section of the ruling is bad news. "This ruling tells the Quebec government it's OK to come up with news ways to limit access to English education," he told The Chronicle in an interview.

Tabachnick conceded the loophole that Bill 104 closed has not been applicable to West Island private high schools anyway. "We've never had this arrangement before," he said.

Still, Pearson and other English-language school boards insist that Bill 104 has been hurting enrolment at their schools.

The court's judgement, with its one-year leeway, gives the government too much room to change the law, Tabachnick said. "The fact that this law is (deemed) unconstitutional is what we expected," he said.

He added the most pressing need now for LBPSB and other English-language school boards in Quebec is to find ways to meet the government and find common legal ground that will satisfy everyone.

That may be easier said than done, with the tone at the National Assembly in the provincial capital today being completely negative. "We would be surprised had the government celebrated the decision," Tabachnick said.

Quebec Culture Minister Christine St. Pierre said she was "shocked and disappointed" to reporters today.

And the opposition Parti Québecois has already questioned why Premier Jean Charest's government had not drawn up provisions in advance of the ruling.

More as it breaks.

These articles could also interest you

Your comments

Full name:
(required)


Email address:


Your comments :
(required)


Please retype the word displayed below Can't read the word?

Please retype the word displayed below:


Michel Gourd

Comment online since October 25th 2009
Canada’s assimilation game

The nearly 400-year-old French culture in North America is in danger of disappearing in many provinces and also decline in Quebec.

French-speaking Canadians are steadily decreasing in number censuses after censuses. Under Quebec’s Bill 101, French is the official language of instruction in the province. Attendance in English schools is restricted. Supreme Court ruling striking down Bill 104 only show how imperfect politic is in Canada. The ruling prompted dire warnings that the survival of the French language was threatened.

Quebec English School Boards Association recently sent an open letter to Jean Charest stating that it support the essential protection and promotion of the French language. If the Quebec government aligns itself to what the other provinces give to their minorities, the problem should easily be resolve and the Quebec English minority will loose McGill university and numerous other linguistic structural advantage that it got in this province. This judgment has the potential to realign Canadians clocks at the same hour in the linguistic issue.

The court suspended its judgment application for a year to give Quebec government time to redraft the law to make it constitutionally compliant. The Canadian assimilation game is easy to see. By slowly raising the temperature of the water, it keeps the frog in the pan and ensures that it is cooked in the end. That sudden rise of eat don’t have enough potential to make it jump out. The way the ROC will respond to this situation has.

Mike Matlin

Comment online since October 23rd 2009
Nice but considering that there have been similar rulings by higher courts IE:Human Rights, World Court, the UN etc that have gone totally unheeded why should a mere "you have a year to change the words" make a difference? I'm also hedging my bets that the Supreme Court ruled on an English version of the text to which the PQ will say. " The law in Quebec is in French therefore the ruling is null and void". Ironically that little quirk saved my butt many years ago when I was busted under the English interpretation of the laws regarding musicians in the metro (by two totally francophone cops that wouldn't even speak to me in English). The words were:". . . est interdit de faire fonctionner une radio , une magnetascope, un intrument musical dans les corridor du metro." The case was tossed because you don't faire fonctioner un insturment muicale , you jouer it. It's all a word game and the PQ keeps changing them all the time.

Rudy Haugeneder, Victoria, BC

Comment online since October 22nd 2009
Ultimately it comes down to the old saying:"When in Rome, do as the Romans do."

Although I don't know whether English is offered as optional second language class in Quebec schools, I suspect it is, just as optional French, German, Mandarin, Cree, Blackfoot, Hindu, Spanish, etc. are offered in some schools in other provinces -- as an optional course but not as a replacement of the primary language.
Canadians would do well to remember that Canada had no real national identity until the threat of Quebec separation became a reality and the rest of the country suddenly realized our culture is somewhat different than the USA -- and began waving the Maple Leaf with pride.

linda thibodeau

Comment online since October 22nd 2009
What's astounding to me is the double standard that Quebecers insist on! They want new immigrants to integrate into their culture and language no matter where these new immigrants come from and they (Quebecers) refuse to integrate into the English (read Canadian) language. Worse is that our federal governments allow this cr@p to go on. Guess they've never heard the saying in Quebec "What's good for the goose is good for the gander".

Related Newspapers


Links