Free classified ads | Online Auctions | Our Weeklies | Long distance call
Transcontinental
The Chronicle
columns
Send this text to a friend Print this article Comment on this article

Fluoride debate bites

Editorial

Article online since November 1st 2006, 8:10
Comment on this article
Fluoride debate bites
Editorial
Dorval was once a proud city that stood independent and didn’t need anything from anyone. It made its own decisions on everything, from police service, to fire service, and even to what it put in its own drinking water.

As we well know, that is no longer the case — in all of those circumstances. Dorval’s 50-year history of fluoridating its drinking water is being interrupted because according to local officials the Montreal agglomeration council is dragging its feet on upgrading the city’s fluoridation tanks, pumps and filtration units. The provincial government has handed over the $400,000 the city needs to update the water-filtration units to reintroduce fluoride, but the agglomeration council — which is controlled by Montreal Mayor Gérald Tremblay, whose party’s councillors hold 87 per cent of the voting power — hasn’t seen fit to let the cash change hands because it contends that as an island-wide service, Dorval’s water-filtration plant falls under its control. Although the practice is widespread in cities across the province, Montreal has never fluoridated its drinking water. Dorval only stopped doing it in 2003 when the units broke, Dorval Mayor Edgar Rouleau said, and wants to go back to it. A study of Dorval schoolchildren showed cavities have doubled since 2003.

Does anybody else get the mental image of a schoolyard bully holding a child’s hat, or tennis ball above their head, only to laugh while the children jump fruitlessly to reclaim what is rightfully theirs? Montreal is playing the part of the schoolyard bully, whose aim apparently, is to make Dorval squirm, or better, to not even let them go ahead at all. Is this what Tremblay had in mind when he said he wanted to unite people upon his initial election in 2001, or is it more like continued punishment for the suburbs that opted out of his mega-city vision.

Do the right thing and let Dorval’s kids get their fluoride back. The provincial government, who usually lead the world in red-tape delays and bureaucracy, have given the project the go-ahead, but Tremblay claims he’s waiting for the provincial government to rule on the safety of fluoridation of water, but it seems pretty clear that if the government is ponying up the cash, it’s a pretty good sign they’re fans of fluoridation.

Montreal claims it’s also waiting for more information from experts about the safety of fluoridation because there is a difference of opinion. Basically, their people think it’s bad, while Dorval’s people think it’s good.

Not to be snarky, but when it comes to information, does a city whose management (or mismanagement, as the case may be) set taxes so high local soccer associations are going to have to start paying user fees on soccer fields, really think it’s dealing from a position of strength? The city that spent its way into a $400 million deficit is going to start giving lessons on civic administration? No, thanks. Let’s give the benefit of the doubt to Dorval on this one. Montreal’s notion of waiting it out just bites.

These articles could also interest you

Your comments

Full name:
(required)


Email address:


Your comments :
(required)


Please retype the word displayed below Can't read the word?

Please retype the word displayed below:


NYS COF

Comment online since November 1st 2006
While I can understand why Dorval wouldn't want to be dominated by Montreal, Dorval residents would not want to drink fluoridated water if they knew all the facts.

First off, the most used fluoride chemicals are silicofluorides - impure waste products of phosphater fertilizer manufacturing which have never been safety tested.

Secondly, fluoride even in low doseages added to water supplies is harmful to certain segments of the population including those allergice or intolerant to fluoride, kidney patients, higher water drinkers and others.

Fluoride is neither a nutrient nor essential for healthy teeth and just slightly over what dentists claim is optimal can cause damaging effects.

Since fluoride is ubiquitous in the food supply and readily available over the counter in toothpaste, it really makes no sense to force fluoride into people whether they want it or not and whether they have teeth or not.

for more info
Fluoridatoin 101
www.orgsites.com/ny/nyscof

Health Effects
www.FluorideAction.Net/health

Fluoridation News Releases
http://tinyurl.com/6kqtu

Tooth Decay Crises in Fluoridated Areas
http://www.fluoridenews.blogspot.com/

Related Newspapers


Reader Poll

  • Are going to stop eating cold cuts and cured meats?
  • YES
  • NO