Free classified ads | Online Auctions | Our Weeklies | Long distance call | Weblocal |
The Chronicle
Send this text to a friend Print this article Comment on this article

Issue burning like fire would

by
View all articles from
Article online since February 26th 2009, 13:43
Read all 3 comments about this article / Comment on this article
  Issue burning like fire would
Issue burning like fire would
While local municipalities may not opt for an outright ban, tougher legislation to counter pollution created by residential wood burning in fireplaces or stoves is long over due.

Last year, Pointe Claire became the first West Island municipality to regulate residential wood smoke with a bylaw amendment forcing all new residential fireplaces or wood stove ovens to meet environmental health and safety standards set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or the Canadian Standards Association.

However, Pointe Claire bylaw doesn't go far enough by asking people to replace older or inefficient wood-burning stoves or fireplaces.

Thousands of Canadians and many West Islanders, especially after the 1998 ice storm, decided to keep a fireplace or woodstove in their home as a secondary heat source. Generally speaking, most West Islanders don't use wood-burning as their primary source for heat, barring a power interruption. They simply use it for pleasure. However, there are negative health implications associated with fireplaces, specifically in urban settings, for both the user and their neighbours. Banning wood stoves is a policy being adopted or considered by some jurisdictions in Canada and the United States, but for the most part, any laws being established simply require any wood-burning device meet EPA or CSA certified equipment to cut down on emissions. Pointe Claire recently adopted a bylaw amendment requiring any new residential wood-burning device meet these certified emission standards in order to reduce pollution. Unfortunately, it's the only West Island municipality with such a law and the City of Montreal also doesn't have rules in place.

A study conducted 10 years ago identified residential wood heating as one of the main sources of air pollution in the Greater Montreal area. Another Montreal study, citing Riviere des Prairies, where most homes used wood as a primary or secondary heating system, reported there was more pollution in this residential district than downtown Montreal with all its traffic and concentration of people and businesses. Furthermore, this study (with data collected between 1999 and 2002) concluded that where wood heating is significant, wood smoke affects ambient air quality. As a result, concentrations of certain pollutants can be five times higher in winter than in the summer.

While some argue it might be environmentally OK to heat your home using wood on a regular basis in the countryside, Pointe Claire, while relatively tranquil, doesn't exactly fit that bill. An outright ban on wood-burning is not the offing, but tighter regulations on emission standards need to be adopted sooner than later.

These articles could also interest you

Your comments

Full name:
(required)


Email address:


Your comments :
(required)


Please retype the word displayed below Can't read the word?

Please retype the word displayed below:


Suzy Mann

Comment online since October 6th 2009
The problem lies only with older wood stoves and fireplaces. If a Fireplace is built and used properly then it pollutes very little. Most of the time I can't even see smoke coming out of my fireplace. We should be encouraging people who have fireplaces or wood stoves that don't work properly to update their appliances, rather then banning new appliances that are highly efficient and pollute very little.

Shirley Brandie

Comment online since February 28th 2009
Banning wood burning appliances is the only way you are going to stop the wood smoke from wrecking havoc with human life and the environment.
Fireplaces are ineffective in heating a home, and only a few hours of wood burning in a single home can drastically raise fine particle concentrations in dozens of surrounding homes throughout the neighbourhood. None of us are protected from this toxic smoke.
Burning wood is a costly and filthy affront to all that are invaded by it. Exposure to the smoke is extremely uncomfortable and causes burning eyes, dry and sore throat, irritation of the nasal passages, cardiovascular system damage, causes some types of cancer and brain damage, headaches, and allergic reactions, among other symptoms.
When smoke is prevalent in the area, people cannot open their windows for fresh air, because there is none. They cannot enjoy their own property due to the stench. Everyone should be able to relax in their own homes without the fear that they are being contaminated by toxic smoke.It is an environmental right of all people.

Rachel Guenin

Comment online since February 26th 2009
We are planning on putting in a wood burning stove within the next two years as a second source of heating.
You never know when you will use it. For the city to say we cannot have it because of the pollution that is just a little problem to the real root cause. Like you stated "tighter regulations on emission standards need to be adopted sooner than later".

Columnist

Related Newspapers


Links