Free classified ads | Online Auctions | Our Weeklies | Long distance call | Weblocal |
The Chronicle
Send this text to a friend Print this article Comment on this article

Grey matter: the headache is over

Hampstead's council votes to support Grey's mandate

by Flavie Halais
View all articles from Flavie Halais
Article online since August 4th 2009, 9:06
Read all 2 comments about this article / Comment on this article
 Grey matter: the headache is over
Seeen here (from left to right) are mayor William Steinberg, and councillors David Sternthal, Michael Goldwax and Abe Gonshor.
Grey matter: the headache is over
Hampstead's council votes to support Grey's mandate
Julius Grey will remain at the service of the town of Hampstead.

The town's council voted to keep the renowned human rights lawyer on board during an exceptionally long and agitated meeting marked by political infighting, the last chapter in a case dating back to several years and involving a recent string of attacks through the media.
"The town has no legal right to discriminate against anyone on the basis of his or her political activities," said mayor William Steinberg shortly before the councillors proceeded to the vote.

Grey, a minority rights advocate, was hired by the town in 2006 to work on a municipal case involving a dog run in Langhorne Park. He drew the ire of many Hampstead residents a few weeks ago after he publicly endorsed Louise Harel in her campaign for Montreal's municipal election with Vision Montréal and was charged with heading one of the working groups she created to advise the party.

This decision obviously stirred up many bitter feelings among residents who remember Harel as the architect of the demerger process when she was Minister of Municipal Affairs.

At the town's previous council meeting, a motion to end Grey's mandate was stopped by Mayor Steinberg's veto, who argued that the absence of two councillors created unfavourable circumstances for a vote. Last Monday's vote was supposed to confirm or overturn Steinberg's veto.

The debate spread in the media in the following weeks, with councillor David Sternthal stating in an op-ed piece published in a local newspaper that "democracy is dead in Hampstead,” Mayor David Steinberg responding by comparing Sternthal's methods to McCarthyism and Louise Harel herself qualifying the reaction to the whole affair as "hysteric."

Although last Monday's vote was the result of the controversy over Grey's endorsement of Harel and focused on the issue of freedom of speech, his mandate with the town was always subject to criticism, mainly over his friendship with the mayor and his qualifications as a municipal affairs lawyer. In fact, two previous votes to end Grey's mandate had already been stopped by Steinberg's veto in 2007.

"I did not support Julius Grey just because of some kind of relationship that is there between the mayor and Mr. Julius Grey," said Councillor Leon Elfassy, who voted in favour of terminating the lawyer's mandate in order to avoid any conflict of interest.

Councillors Abe Gonshor and David Sternthal also voted to overturn the mayor's veto, while Bonnie Feigenbaum and Michael Goldwax voted to sustain it (Goldwax's decision was motivated by financial considerations.) Four votes would have been needed to quash the veto.

The tone of the council meeting was dominated by infighting, with several members of the public engaging in heated debates with the councillors while Mayor Steinberg and Councillor Sternthal, a candidate to next fall's mayoral election, exchanged verbal attacks.

"I think tonight, Mr. Mayor, you should look in the mirror and be ashamed of what you have just done or said, and Mr. Mayor, I am disappointed in you," said Sternthal during one of these exchanges.

What the two agreed on, however, is that residents will be the sole judges on the November 1 municipal election.

These articles could also interest you

Linked photos

Your comments

Full name:
(required)


Email address:


Your comments :
(required)


Please retype the word displayed below Can't read the word?

Please retype the word displayed below:


David Sternthal

Comment online since August 10th 2009
The Town of Hampstead did not seek to terminate the mandate of Julius Grey because of his public support for Harel. As readers can see from the following comments the motivating factor was that Grey was Steinberg's attorney in his first mayoral campaign which services he provided at no cost and is Steinberg's personal friend.



Below are the comments presented at the August 3rd Council meeting which sets the record straight.

Sternthal address at Council meeting on August 3, 2009




Nathaniel Hanover

Comment online since August 5th 2009
This article is an awful and incomplete summary of what transpired at Hampstead's Town Council meeting. Mayor Steinberg called the police to remove an aged woman who simply wanted to ask her second question. Mayor Steinberg also accused David Sternthal of releasing a disingenuous flyer. But when Mr. Sternthal defended his flyer and spoke about the contents of the KPMG report that it references - a report that Mayor Steinberg failed to read (presumably because it was written in french, a language that he does not speak) - the Mayor called a recess. This is all attested to in the minutes and in the recordings made by residents who were present. The Mayor then returned and stated that Council was considering the charges made by Mr. Sternthal in his flyer - the only counselor who presumable read the report. If the flyer was baseless, why did the Mayor state in the end that its charges were under consideration. The Mayor also repeatedly went out of his way to attack Mr. Sternthal - and admitted that he had investigated the hiring, some ten years ago, of Mr. Sternthal's son by the Town. This on its own was disturbing; even more disturbing, though, is the fact that the Mayor highlighted this apparent act of "patronage" and used it to defend his decision to hire his close personal friend, Julius Grey, a constitutional lawyer to manage a municipal case. The Mayor, who admitted that Mr. Grey was his friend and that Mr. Grey had provided him with free legal advice during his campaign for election some four years ago (Mr. Grey did not charge the Mayor for his service), then proceeded to defend his decision to hire Mr. Grey as an equivalent act - as an equivalent act! Ladies and gentlemen, think what you will about the coming election, and about the candidates, but know that the press is not reporting what is taking place. Attend the Council meetings and see for yourself, with your eyes, what type of a man the Mayor is - how petty, and foolish and misguided and inappropriate his treatment of Hampstead's citizens truly is, and you will understand why he cannot be re-elected - why he must be stopped.

Related Newspapers


Links